By James Otis
This particular book is copyrighted 1895. As such, being a children's book, there is nothing in the way of langauge or insinuation that would hinder the willingness to let children read it.
The story follows three lads from New Hampshire as they follow their desire to enlist in the Contential army in 1781.
First they head off to join Col. Scammell (a fellow townsman), being chased first by an uncle of one of the lads and later by a couple of Tory spies. From there they are sent to Virginia where they get the dangerous mission of spying for General Lafayette. Finally they are able to actually enlist and prove themselves noble soldiers all during the seige of Yorktown.
Being a book written in the late 1800's the story moves slightly slower than modern stories tend to. (In fact, I thought the author wrote rather like I do--there seemed almost to be mutliple climaxes.) I did enjoy it mostly, but did take some issue with the constant allusion to "luck". It was meant as "luck" and not providence--at least as far as I could descern. That was my really biggest problem with the story. The fact that one of the characters (Josh) held a great deal of animosity towards another (Sim) was less bothersome. This would probably be because 1) Sim is an evil man, not to be trusted and 2) Josh never claims to be a Christain.
I thought the way the author drew quotes from historical books and documents during the later part of the book to detail the situation around about the fall of Yorktown was an interesting tactic.
The fifth book I have read by Robert Ballentyne, Hunted and Harried is a story of the Scottish Covenenters.
The tale follows young Will Wallace, who throws in his lot with the hunted Covenenters, initially because he has little other choice, but later because he embraces their beliefs. Will and his Covenenter friends face the persecution of the "killing times" with loyality and bravery; friendship and love (romance doesn't exactly fit) grow and is strengthened even through the terror and misery around them.
Ballentyne does not go into overly gory details about the torture involved, but he speaks plainly and openly of the brave Convenenter martyrs and what they underwent--men, women, and in some cases children. As with his other books (drawing from the limited number I have read), Ballentyne weaves occasionally lengthly expositions of the history of the era into his tale and does more than just tell the reader what happened. He challenges the reader to learn, understand, and implement that learning. (He differs from Henty in this aspect. Henty's history is worked in a little more sublty--less like he is actually sitting there, eye to eye, talking with you.)
I highly recommend Ballentyne's works for both boys and girls (though they are really addressed more to the young men). He holds up high standards for his reader and is really quite engaging. For a younger reader, they might be a little hard because Ballentyne writes like a man from his era. The Victorian writers used more language, a wider vocabularly, than your average person is used to.
I would definitely recommend this book as a starting place for someone's study of the Scottish Covenenters. I learned several things from this book that I previously did not know (not that I have extensively studied the Convenenters). The only warning I might give does concern the description of torture. Like I said above, it is not overly gory but it is there. (How can one discuss torture without describing it to some extent?)
By Frances Hodgson Burnett
Seeing how much I have enjoyed Frances Burnett's classic tales The Secret Garden and The Little Princess (both at least twice), when I discovered this one, I just had to read it. I wasn't disappointed for the story held me in it's grips.
The hero is a 12 year-old man--for boy does not quite fit the extremely self-disciplined lad. Marco Loristan is the son of his father; which might sound odd, but it is very much a part of this story. Stefan Loristan is an exile from his native country (where in fact he has never actually been), Samavia (a fictious place in east Europe). Throughout his son's life they have always been poor, never staying any one place overly long--hunted almost as it were.
The story of the Lost Prince--practially a god to the people of Samavia--is woven throughout the book and is in fact the driving force behind much of the character's actions.
This is where I find some quibbles with the story. For starters, the practically god-like nature of this 'lost prince' is somewhat disturbing to the Christian who holds that God is the only one who deserves and should get such undying devotion and reverence. (Though on the one hand one could almost say this could be exempletory of how we ought to live and die for our Heavenly King.) The feelings the loyal Samavians have for the Lost Prince are echoed by Marco and his friend "The Rat" towards Marco's father. (The tender, manly love between father and son is very encouraging and lovely to read.) Almost more "disturbing" is the thread throughout the book of some old Buhddist hermit's teachings to Stefan Loristan that he has passed on to his son. God is spoken of reverently throughout the book, but such talk of God is common from literature from the late 1880's and early 1900's because Christianity was so universally believed in the West during that time.
Still, the bravery and self-sacrificing love and loyalty of the characters is both thrilling and encouraging in this day of effeminate men. I enjoyed the story of adventure and intrigue and watching the growth of Marco and The Rat into stronger fellows. Because of the Eastern Mysticism, I would be inclined to not recommend this book for an undiscerning reader--it is amazing how stories teach and how it causes one to desire to emulate the characters. For that matter, there is much to emulate in the characters and little to not recommend them to you as upstanding persons.
By Bill Yenne
The subtitle is a basic summation of the contents of the book: The Heroic Saga of the Two Top-Scoring American Aces of World War II.
This book engagingly tells the story of Major Tommy McGuire and Major Dick Bong and their "Ace Race". But more than that, the author gives the reader insight into the lives and personalities of these two young men.
The story is broke into three sections, "Boys", "Warriors", and "Rememberance". The first section brings McGuire and Bong to the brink of war. The second section takes them through the war. Each chapter in this section is headed by a 'score card'--noting how many confirmed enemy planes they had shot down. The third section is post war, a remembering of these two top-aces.
When I started the book, I was thrilled to discover that these two young men flew my second favorite fighter plane; a P-38! I learned a lot about the planes themselves. In fact, before reading this book, I did not really know that P-38's were fighters, much less their amazing speed and mobility.
Stationed in the Pacific, America's two top aces were friends as well as 'rivals'. They were in different squadons and fighter groups at different times, though both served all their time in the Fifth Air Force. At times they flew together, at other times they were grounded. McGuire went through at least five planes--each one named Pudgy after his wife. (That was her nickname--her real name was Marilynn.)
Both had different methods of attack, but both were outstanding fighter pilots...
The author likens fighter pilot to the knights of old, the planes to the war horses. It is an interesting comparison, but actually rather fitting, as both knights and pilots are encased in steel, under them a powerful means of transporation.
There is hardly anything objectionable in this book. The only language is direct quotations from the men's letter's home.
I really enjoyed the book. It was both informative and engaging. I learned more about the structure of the USAAF from this book than I ever had any inkling of before.
I would recommend this book to those interested in WWII, the Pacific Theater, and old war birds.
By Gordon H. Clark
I finished this book last week after spending several weeks reading one to two chapters each Sunday. Like the title declares, the book is about Behaviorism and Christianity.
Dr. Clark profiles several prominent proponents of Behaviorism, namely John Watson, Edgar Singer, Gilbert Ryle, and B.F. Skinner. The last chapter is an exposition on how Behaviorism and Christianity are incompatable; using the so-called Christian Behaviorist Donald MacKay's ideas as a jumping off point.
The essence of Behaviorism, when brought down to it's most simple terms, is a denial of the spiritual, of souls, and anything non-mechanical. Even thought is described as nothing more than chemical reactions! Once the reader is thoroughly flooded with the main points of Behaviorist ideology, he is quickly shown the logical holes that it possesses. More importantly, Clark demonstrates how Behaviorism and Christianity cannot mix.
Dr. Clark's writing style is engaging, though definitely intellectual. One's understanding of his writing would be greatly enhanced had one actually read the works he references. Of course, were one a little more philosophically minded than I am, that might also help. I always find that Dr. Clark, while frequently enough writing over my head, had such a sense of humor that one cannot get bored with his books--even when slightly muddled about the exact topic on hand.
A Reformed Presbyterian girl who enjoys a good movie or a good book any ol'
Note: All images picked up online. No copyright infringment intended.